1. | 2. | ||
3. | 4. |
1. | 12 | 2. | 13 |
3. | 15 | 4. | 16 |
Assertion (A): | Chlorine is an electron-withdrawing group, yet it exhibits ortho- and para-directing behavior in electrophilic aromatic substitution. |
Reason (R): | Inductive effect of chlorine destabilises the intermediate carbocation formed during the electrophilic substitution, however due to the more pronounced resonance effect, the halogen stabilises the carbocation at ortho and para positions. |
1. | Both (A) and (R) are True and (R) is the correct explanation of (A). |
2. | Both (A) and (R) are True but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). |
3. | (A) is True but (R) is False. |
4. | (A) is False but (R) is True. |
1. | sp2 and sp3 | 2. | sp2 and sp2 |
3. | sp3 and sp2 | 4. | sp3 and sp3 |
I | II |
(a) | \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_3\right)_2 \stackrel{\oplus}{\mathrm{C}}-\mathrm{CH}_2-\mathrm{CH}_3 \) |
(b) | \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_3\right)_3 \stackrel{\oplus}{\mathrm{C}} \) |
(c) | \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_3\right)_2 \stackrel{\oplus}{\mathrm{C}}\mathrm{H} \) |
(d) | \( \text {CH}_3 \stackrel{\oplus}{\mathrm{C}}\mathrm{H}_2\) |
(e) | \( \stackrel{\oplus}{\mathrm{C}}\mathrm{H}_3 \) |
1. | e < d < c < a < b | 2. | d < e < c < a < b |
3. | a < e < d < c < b | 4. | e < d < c < b < a |
1. | sp2 | 2. | spd2 |
3. | sp2d | 4. | sp3 |
1. | 2. | ||
3. | 4. |