List-I (Material) |
List-II (Susceptibility (\(\chi\))) |
||
\(\mathrm{A.}\) | Diamagnetic | \(\mathrm{I.}\) | \(\chi=0\) |
\(\mathrm{B.}\) | Ferromagnetic | \(\mathrm{II.}\) | \(0>\chi\geq-1\) |
\(\mathrm{C.}\) | Paramagnetic | \(\mathrm{III.}\) | \(\chi\gg1\) |
\(\mathrm{D.}\) | Non-magnetic | \(\mathrm{IV.}\) | \(0<\chi<\varepsilon\) (a small positive number) |
1. | \(M\) | 2. | \(\dfrac{M\pi}{2}\) |
3. | \( \dfrac{M}{2\pi}\) | 4. | \(\dfrac{2M}{\pi}\) |
List-I (Material) | List-II (Example) | ||
A. | Diamagnet | I. | Alnico |
B. | Paramagnet | II. | Copper |
C. | Soft ferromagnet | III. | Aluminium |
D. | Hard ferromagnet | IV. | Gadolinium |
1. | 2. | ||
3. | 4. |
1. | 2. | ||
3. | 4. |
Assertion (A): | Gauss's law for magnetism states that the net magnetic flux through any closed surface is zero. |
Reason (R): | The magnetic monopoles do not exist. North and South poles occur in pairs, allowing vanishing net magnetic flux through the surface. |
1. | (A) is True but (R) is False. |
2. | (A) is False but (R) is True. |
3. | Both (A) and (R) are True and (R) is the correct explanation of (A). |
4. | Both (A) and (R) are True but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). |